Princeton High School teachers considering letting their students read this book. As you can see, Anthony Bukoski's book Time Between Trains has some problems; however, it also has some positive aspects. Things like good characters, short stories, and stories that your students might relate to make this an okay book. However, awkward settings and abrupt endings draw back the wellness of Time Between Trains.
Purpose of the Essay In this essay, you will be judging the quality of a book, either fiction or nonfiction, depending on the semester. Your writing purpose in a Justifying an Evaluation Essay is to judge the quality of the book as a work of art with sounds reasons based on your careful analysis of specific elements of the book, while a the same time avoiding personal judgments about the book or author based on life-experience or taste.
This semester, you will compose an essay where your goal is to judge the quality of the graphic novel Nothing Better, Vol. You will support your judgment with sound, fair, thorough evidence based on clear, fair criteria. Thus, and this is critical, you will not be defending a judgment on whether you necessarily "like" the book or not, but whether the book is "good" based on as objective criteria as possible.
The main purpose of writing a critical review is to be able to evaluate "subjective" works of art in an objective manner rather than by personal taste or preference, which is the essential definition of "subjective.
The key to the success of a critic "reviewer" is to suppress the "fan" or the "hater" in favor of giving the critical reasoning parts of the brain a chance to uncover the truth about the quality of a subject, both good and bad points.
The key here is to check personal "feelings" at the door in favor of critical reasoning.
Thus, objective support for a sound judgment thesis looks like this: In a book review, the objective evidence is right before you: Instead, your thoughtful analysis and questioning of the evidence, your "critical thoughts" about what is on the page, should be your objective support for your judgment, i.
What "Justifying an Evaluation" Means "Justifying an Evaluation" is interchangeable with the purpose of the review. The job of a critical evaluator is to defend a judgment about the value, or worth, of something. Beyond book reviews, other examples of critical evaluations are movie and music reviews, product reviews, and so on.
Some judgments can be positive and some negative, but rarely is a true critical judgment either all positive or all negative. If a subject is examined carefully, even the most beloved work of art has faults, and even the worst has positive attributes.
The key is to examine the book closely, understand the criterion, and avoid adding personal taste or emotion into the evaluation, and to address both positive and negative aspects of the book.
To be truly "critical" is to be neither purely favorable a "fan" or purely negative a "hater"but somewhere in between. The Difference Between Taste and Judgment A judgment, by definition, is a statement of value, of approval or disapproval, and people judge all the time.
The term is often viewed negatively, especially when individuals judge other individuals. However, making sound judgments about works of art is a necessary task in order to maintain a clear set of standards for the given artistic genre and to understand those standards.
The problem with many judgments, though, is that they are often based on personal taste rather than critical reasoning. When personal taste is used to support a judgment, there is really no call for support.
No reasons are necessary or even possible when making a purely taste-based decision, and because of this, the judgments are almost always unsound when held up to critical questioning. It is a mass-generalization, based purely on personal preference, that would be impossible to support by fair criteria.
It is a judgment driven by bias rather than reasoning. That is a taste-based rather than reason-based judgment. It is judgment based purely on my own personal taste rather than on careful scrutiny of the music itself.Common Mistakes When Writing an Evaluation Essay – Confusing an evaluation essay with a review.
A review is a brief summary and commentary of a book, a movie, or a play, while an evaluation paper provides readers with your personal and detailed assessment about a certain object or idea.
The Evaluation Essay The purpose of an evaluation essay is to demonstrate the overall quality (or lack thereof) of a particular product, business, place, service or program. Topics for an Evaluation Essay.
An Evaluation Essay calls for a true, unbiased evaluation of a subject based on a set of criteria; writing one means that the student-writer offers their judgment on something – whether it be a book, film, poem, etc.
Essay #3: Evaluation Essay This essay will evaluate an item (automobile, restaurant, film, television show, book, or a recent or prospective purchase). The evaluation essay is an argumentative essay, so it requires evidence to support your opinion and conclusion .
Sample Conclusions for a Book Evaluation Essay # 1 – Audience: Princeton High School teachers considering letting their students read this book. As you can see, Anthony Bukoski's book Time Between Trains has some problems; however, it also has some positive aspects. Things like good characters, short stories, and stories that your students might relate to make this an okay book.
Evaluation essays set out to create criteria and then judge or evaluate the subject based on these criteria. Writing an evaluation essay requires the writer to fully analyze both sides and determine an .