Summary Analysis The story begins with a description of the dead man: He lay on his back, dead, in the middle of the trail. He was thin and bony with a sunken chest, not many muscles, "a scholar maybe.
Poem Summary Lines The poem is being set up; the action in the poem has already taken place and the narrator of the poem is ruminating on this action. This is a technique that in contemporary literature would be considered a flashback.
Lines The speaker locates both himself and the other fellow on a battlefield, a far cry from the ancient inn he imagines in retrospect. Lines These lines are as jarring and sudden as a gunshot.
Two people on opposing lines shoot; one is left dead and the other still enjoys the ability to be able to reflect on the actions. This is the plot of the poem and its climax.
Lines In these lines there is a justification for the killing and it is a simple justification, without deliberation. Lines In these lines the narrator begins deliberation, speculating about the man he has just killed and beginning to attribute his own motives to the dead man.
Remember that in line 7, they shot at each other, and the narrator could just as easily have been the dead man. In fact, he imaginarily becomes the dead man. He did it offhand, without much thought about the possible consequences, including the situation he has just encountered.
Line 17 Now the speaker gives some thought to the condition of war. One can think of it as a word which describes antique shops, not a war, but it can also be taken to mean cunning. Lines Here the narrator defines the curious nature of war—you shoot a man, who under other circumstances you would act kindly toward, a man who could possibly become your friend.
This movement from individual accountability to universal justification leads the speaker to a distance within himself and perhaps causes the use of the second person when the poet may still be speaking of himself.
The speaker a returned soldier and his friends, natives of the hamlet. The first stanza is so warm-hearted and lacking in rancor, it belies the fact that he killed the man about whom he is speaking. The speaker talks casually and warmly of the inn, creating a setting that harshly contrasts with the battlefield where he encountered this man.
It is apparent that the speaker feels a bond with his victim, because the poem opens with an air of regret: Unfortunately their encounter was in a completely different setting where they had predetermined roles; their only possible roles were as enemies. It seems the most natural action in the world that infantrymen would shoot at and possibly kill each other.
It is that knowledge that confuses the speaker and makes him struggle to grasp the reason for his act.
On the one hand there is the congenial setting of the inn where men buy each other drinks and loan each other money; on the other is the field of battle where men kill each other. The narrator cannot explain how, in each situation, two men could have such converse relationships.
The contrast is all the more poignant because from the very start of the poem, the narrator reveals himself as preferring the inn, although he has committed an act completely antithetical to its spirit.The Man He Killed.
Had he and I but met By some old ancient inn, We should have set us down to wet Right many a nipperkin! But ranged as infantry, And staring face to face.
Explication of “The Man He Killed” In “The Man He Killed,” Thomas Hardy demonstrates a sense of disgust for war, by comparing two men, who could have grown up together, and are now fighting against each other for someone else’s cause.
“The Man I Killed” from The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien His jaw was in his throat, his upper lip and teeth were gone, his one eye was shut, his other eye was a .
Mar 07, · Analysis of “The Man I Killed” About halfway through the novel, O’Brien describes an incident that has permanently altered his life, killing another man. O’Brien has such difficulty describing the man that he had killed that he avoids using the first person in his writing.
viewpoint in their own ways in their poems: "The Man He Killed", "Reconciliation", and "Dreamers". In The Man He Killed, Hardy speaks about the absurdity of war.
"I want you to watch and see if I'm not right in what I say: that the white man in his press, is going to identify me with "hate." He will make use of me dead, as he has made use of me alive, as a convenient symbol of "hatred"—and that will .